China’s recovery is built on shaky foundations
Whatever happens to the world’s second-largest economy will have a major effect on global growth
Confidence in China’s post-Covid recovery has started to waver. Earlier this month, the world’s second-largest economy reported disappointing figures for two of the major drivers of its economy – property and exports.
In response, the country’s central bank decided to take the opposite approach to Western counterparts, such as the Bank of England, by cutting its main interest rates to try to stimulate investment in the economy.
Beijing had hoped to recapture previous highs after the government ended its zero-Covid policy at the end of last year. But there are some indications that China may instead settle into the same moderate growth patterns during the medium to long term as other advanced economies.
When Chinese GDP growth bounced back to exceed market expectations in the first quarter of 2023, growing at 4.5% year on year, it was good news for the country and for the global economy. The surge was partly led by retail sales.
They shot up by 10.6% in March after the lifting of Covid restrictions started to filter through to the domestic economy.
Covid policy
More importantly for the rest of the world, Beijing’s Covid policy switch unblocked supply chains and led to a 14.8% rise in exports in March compared with the same month in 2022.
Of course, it’s easy to hit high growth rates from a low base, but this was still a welcome sign that China could meet International Monetary Fund (IMF) expectations for GDP growth of 5.2% in 2023.
Yet all was not what it seemed. China’s recovery is actually built on quite shaky foundations. There is weakness in domestic real estate investment and export expectations due to uncertain global demand and ongoing trade frictions with the United States.
So, what can – and should – the Chinese government do about this? Domestically, the Chinese government has started to use monetary policy – interest rate cuts – to generate growth via personal and business borrowing.
And the amount of money circulating in China’s economy has picked up because people and businesses are finding it easier to borrow. This means that domestic demand could help meet the government’s official 5% growth target this year.
Yet longer-term uncertainty abounds about China’s prospects.
The IMF has forecast GDP growth of 4.5% in 2024, falling to around 3.2% by 2028. This slowdown is expected because of issues such as fragility in China’s real estate sector and a decline in the workforce due to age.
Urban population
Before Covid, China’s increasingly urban population worked in booming industries such as green tech to turbocharge growth. This partly drove soaring GDP numbers from -27.3% in 1961 to 6% pre-Covid.
But achieving similar rates won’t be as easy in the future.
The reasons for the spectacular past performance of China’s economy are well known. The 1978-2019 period was when China opened up its economy and saw its exports boom. Research often links competition through trade to productivity and growth.
It also helped that, during this time, China shifted its manufacturing focus from low-productivity industries, such as mining heavy metals and coal, to highly productive enterprises like computing and green technology.
As mentioned, urbanization and the shift in population from rural areas have played a part in the country’s past performance. And China’s government has also used infrastructure investment to boost business during downturns quite effectively.
Still, Beijing is unlikely to be able to use the same strategies to return to its previous high-growth path. It’s much more likely to settle into the kind of moderate trajectory experienced by developed economies like the US.
To understand why, let’s start with the fundamentals. The size of its workforce is declining, affecting the contribution of labor to the economy.
China is also facing a demographic problem of a decreasing population – a drop of 850,000 last year – and an increasing dependency ratio.
State-run banks
This means there are fewer workers to support those that have retired.
An increasing dependency ratio has implications for the future of trade because total population consumption will start to outstrip whatever is produced by the working population.
Domestic demand will grow faster than domestic output and this will create a mismatch when it comes to the way the Chinese government has traditionally invested in its economy.
In the decades since it opened up, China invested in domestic businesses through its largely state-run banks.
But if China’s savings ratio starts to fall due to its demographic changes – as its aging population stops working and starts spending their savings rather than generating more income – the government will have to find a new way to finance domestic investment.
The state’s reputation for strong intervention in private industry will complicate this issue by weakening growth in investment, which will further restrict the domestic economy.
Stronger regulation of shadow banking has decreased access to finance for both people and businesses. The financial sector remains heavily regulated and high-profile interventions in the digital economy have created a sense of uncertainty that may weaken investment.
Advanced enconomies
A recent World Bank Group study projects Chinese growth of 4% in the decade after 2030, if there are comprehensive reforms in areas like state regulation of private business. But with only limited reform, 2030’s growth is projected to fall below 2%.
This will have an impact far beyond China’s borders.
The country has the potential to grow faster than the advanced economies for decades if it can overcome these challenges. And, of course, whatever happens in China is likely to have a major effect on global growth.
Kent Matthews is a Professor of Banking and Finance at the Cardiff University.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of China Factor.