Any port in a storm no longer applies amid China curbs
Shocking shipping news forces up the costs of moving goods and fuels fears of rising inflation
Ningbo-Zhousan may not exactly be a household name, but find something in your house made in China and it’s quite likely it was delivered from there.
Recently, the port had more than 50 ships waiting to dock. That was because the Ningbo-Meishan terminal, which handles about one-fifth of the port’s total volumes, had been closed after a member of staff tested positive for Covid-19.
Unfortunately, that was the tip of the iceberg in shipping. China has eight of the top 10 busiest ports in the world, and they are running at well below normal capacity because of Covid-19 restrictions.
From Shanghai to Hong Kong to Xiamen, ships could be found in long queues ready to unload. The diversions from Ningbo only made that worse.
The United States west coast is also seeing bad congestion, with many ships anchored in California’s San Pedro Bay, awaiting access to the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.
This has sent the cost of shipping rates for containers through the roof. The cost of moving a 40-foot container from China to Europe is currently running at around US$14,000, about ten times what it would normally be. So how long will this continue, and what will be the knock-on effects?
This situation is noticeably different to 2020. Covid-19 restrictions had weakened the cargo-handling capacity of ports then as well, but it was less of an issue because global demand for consumer products was so much lower earlier in the pandemic.
Now that many countries have vaccinated large numbers of people and their economies are reopening, demand has bounced back with a vengeance, and ports are not coping well.
On top of that have been other problems, not least the Suez Canal blockage in March. With ships stuck for a week after the huge Ever Given container vessel got stranded, they were under more pressure than usual to return to Asia after they finally reached their destinations in Europe and the Americas.
As a result, many didn’t wait to be fully loaded. This contributed to a lack of shipping containers in Asia, which was already becoming an issue because of ships not always calling in at their usual ports because of the pandemic.
The upshot is that containers have become more expensive, which has forced shipping companies to charge higher freight rates to cover the cost.
At the same time, the weather has caused problems during the summer. Both the southern Chinese port of Yangtian and part of the port of Shanghai have spent periods closed because of typhoon alerts.
The backlog has also been worsened by major importers balking at the shipping costs and chartering their own ships instead. Home Depot, the big home improvement retailer in the US, did this in June for instance.
There has actually been a slight decrease in shipping rates in the past ten days, which has seen the Freightos Baltic Index fall from $10,380 to $9,568 per 20-foot container. But this is nothing to get excited about.
It broadly reflects the fact that the cost of shipping goods from China to the US has come down after ships diverted to that route to make the most of the high prices. Other routes, such as China to Europe and Europe to the Americas, are still mostly going up in price.
As to whether this will continue, it is extremely difficult to say. Some freight companies have ordered new container ships to help address the shortage, but these vessels take two or three years to build so that is not going to make any difference in the short term.
What matters is future Covid-19 outbreaks and to what extent China and other major port nations have to impose tough regulations to protect their populations. Perhaps we will be lucky and the situation will steadily improve from here, or perhaps this mismatch between supply and demand will endure for several years.
In the meantime, we can expect inflation to rise as importers pass on the costs of shipping to customers. Given that governments and central bankers were already worried about rising inflation, they could do without this extra dimension.
If the problem with shipping rates continues, it is also likely to feed into boardroom discussions about whether it is wise to rely so heavily on China as the manufacturing hub of the world.
With relations between the world’s second-largest economy and the West already at a low, and talk of globalization giving way to regionalization, many are already arguing that they should make more consumer goods closer to home, or “nearshoring” as it is known in the trade.
But more imminently, one big issue will be putting the fear of God into retailers: Christmas. All those ships that diverted from their usual China-Europe route to help serve the US are cutting it fine to get back to China in time to restock.
The crossing takes about 45 days, and they need to then leave China by about mid-October to make the 35-day crossing to get goods to Europe in time for December. If there is still congestion at Chinese ports by October, this may not be possible.
The longer that the shipping crisis continues, the more that Christmas will be in trouble. It could become a huge news story in the weeks ahead as everyone looks forward to a “normal” festive season.
Also, many retailers desperately need a strong Christmas 2021 to help make up for what they lost from Covid-19 restrictions.
If only an old man in a red suit with a sleigh could really take care of everything, we could all breathe a sigh of relief.
Stavros Karamperidis is a lecturer in maritime economics at the University of Plymouth in the United Kingdom.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of China Factor.