Pelosi and Taiwan have become a toxic mix for China
Her proposed visit would come at a sensitive time for Beijing ahead of the 20th Congress of the Communist Party
US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi hasn’t confirmed when – or even if – she is to visit Taiwan.
Yet such is the sensitivity over the democratic island’s status that reports of her possible trip have resulted in a warning by China of “serious consequences” and a suggestion by President Joe Biden that the visit was “not a good idea.”
Amid the rhetoric and heightened tensions, Taiwan is conducting military drills.
The comments follow a report by the Financial Times that Pelosi planned to take a delegation to Taiwan in August. The outlet based its report on six people “familiar with the situation.” A Pelosi’s spokesperson has said she could neither confirm nor deny the reported trip.
As someone who has long studied the United States’ delicate diplomatic dance over Taiwan, I understand why this reported trip has sparked a reaction in Washington and Beijing, given the current tensions in the region.
It also marks the continuation of a process that has seen growing US political engagement with Taipei – much to China’s annoyance.
The controversy over Pelosi’s potential visit stems from the “one China” policy – the diplomatic stance under which Washington recognizes China and acknowledges Beijing’s position that Taiwan is part of China.
Shifting recognition
The policy has governed American relations with Taiwan for the last 40-plus years.
In 1979, Washington abandoned its previous policy of recognizing the government of Taiwan as that of all of China, instead shifting recognition to the mainland Chinese government.
As part of this change, the US cut off formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, with the American embassy there replaced by a nongovernmental entity called the American Institute in Taiwan.
The institute was a de facto embassy. Even so, until 2002, Americans assigned to the institute would have to resign from US State Department to go there, only to be rehired once their term was over. And contact between the two governments was technically unofficial.
As the government in Taiwan pursued democracy – starting from the lifting of martial law in 1987 through the first fully democratic elections in 1996 – it shifted away from the assumption once held by governments in China and Taiwan of eventual reunification with the mainland.
Beijing, however, has never abandoned the idea of “one China” and rejects the legitimacy of Taiwanese self-government. That has made direct contact between Taipei and Washington representatives contentious to Chinese officials.
Indeed, in 1995, when Lee Teng-hui, Taiwan’s first democratically elected president, touched down in Hawaii en route to Central America, he didn’t even set foot on the tarmac.
The US State Department had already warned that he would be refused an entry visa to the US but had allowed for a brief, low-level reception in the airport lounge during refueling. Apparently feeling snubbed, Lee refused to leave the airplane.
Two years after this incident came a visit to Taiwan by then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
Biden’s blessing
Similar to the possible Pelosi visit, the one by Gingrich annoyed Beijing. But it was easier for the White House to distance itself from Gingrich – he was a Republican politician visiting Taiwan in his own capacity, and clearly not on behalf of then-President Bill Clinton.
Pelosi’s possible visit could be different because she is a member of the same party as President Joe Biden. China, therefore, may assume she has Biden’s blessing, despite his comments to the contrary.
Asked on July 20 about his views on the potential trip, Biden responded that the “military thinks it’s not a good idea right now.”
The comment echoes the White House’s earlier handling of a comment by Biden in which he suggested in May 2022 that the US would intervene “militarily” should China invade Taiwan.
Officials in the Biden administration rolled back the comment, which would have broken a long-standing policy of ambiguity over what the US would do if China tried to take Taiwan by force.
Similar to Pelosi, the White House is distancing itself from a position that suggests a shift in Washington-Taipei relations following a period in which the US had already been trying to rethink how it interacts with Taiwan.
In 2018, Congress passed the bipartisan Taiwan Travel Act. This departed from the previous policy in that it allowed bilateral official visits between the US and Taiwan, although they are still considered to be subdiplomatic.
In the wake of that act, then-President Donald Trump’s Health and Human Services secretary, Alex Azar, became the highest-ranking American official to visit Taiwan since 1979. In 2020, Keith Krach, undersecretary for economic growth, energy, and the environment, visited Taipei.
And in April 2022, a US congressional delegation visited Taiwan. Pelosi herself was reportedly due to visit the island that same month but canceled after testing positive for COVID-19.
Each of these visits has provoked angry statements from Beijing.
Powerful neighbors
A high-profile visit – even one without the public backing of the White House – would signal support to the island at a time when the invasion of Ukraine by Russia has raised questions over the international community’s commitment to protecting smaller states from more powerful neighbors.
Meanwhile, the erosion of democracy in Hong Kong has undermined China’s commitment to the idea of “one nation, two systems.”
The principle, which allowed Hong Kong to maintain its economic, political and social systems while returning to the mainland after the end of British rule, had been cited as a model for reunification with Taiwan.
The Chinese Communist Party also plans to hold its 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party in the coming months, making the timing sensitive for a Taiwan visit from a high-profile US political figure such as Pelosi.
Meredith Oyen is an Associate Professor of History and Asian Studies at the University of Maryland in Baltimore County
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of China Factor.